![]() ![]() ![]() I don't use the app to its full potential as I don't use it to create flight plans although I know I can. But since the 430 in the plane has traffic I don't sweat it too much and would rather get up and flying instead of sitting on the deck trying to fiddle with submenus to connect for something I already have. I saw in the 430 manual that I can connect to it but haven't tried yet, maybe I'll give it a shot today as the plane I'm using today has a 430. Connecting to the Garmin transponder has been problematic but I'll try again later today when I go fly. I can connect it to the appero transponders in the schools planes easily and receive traffic data right on my screen. I'm a Flight Plan Go user as it was recommended by my CFI and I'm happy with it. ForeFlight charges extra FlyQ and some others do not (and FlyQ, like ForeFlight, has good taxi diagrams for airports the FAA doesn't). First time you go to an airport with more than one runway, yo will realize how beneficial (I'd say necessary) those are. OTOH, for a VFR pilot there is a Foreflight feature I don't like - Foreflight will charge you for a "pro" subscription - basically an IFR subscription - in order to give you georeferenced taxi diagrams. Foreflight's other big plus is the sheer number of users - that means easy availability of advice if you need it. A few others do it the ForeFlight way (Aerovie for one) and it's a feature I like. ![]() Do the same in ForeFlight and it will paint it on the map so yo can see it and play with it without ever leaving the page. On the former, comparing, say FlyQ, put a tentative flight plan in the FlyQ search box and it will bring you to the flight plan page and generate a flight plan based. The two biggest strengths of ForeFlight are "what if" planning and the way it handles instrument flight. I am also pretty familiar with most of the others out there - I have a dozen EFBs about equally divided between iOS and Android. ![]() There were some Windows offerings, but they were iffy. At the time there were only ForeFlight and WingX in the market and Android tablets didn't exist. I've been using ForeFlight for more than 7 years. It's more about what you like than anything else. 90% of these apps are the same in terms of feature set. And, to a very large degree, "most important" is more about how you get to a feature than what the feature is. The method an app uses to bring up instrument approach plates may be important to an instrument pilot but not to a VFR-only pilot. But after a while of playing with the app and more importantly, flying with it, I've not had any issues getting around the UI.Ĭlick to expand.Here's the problem. Garmin Pilot wins there with its big buttons that are easy to find and relatively flat architecture. Probably my biggest (and really my only) complaint is that it's a little clunky in its UI. I think the only big things you don't get are synthetic vision and a decent profile view of your plan (but rumor is, that's coming in the near future). App support is pretty solid as well when I started having issues with an older iPad running the app. I use android and apple products so I like having similar product on different platforms. It's a nice feature but even as an instrument pilot, I've not once needed it.įltPlanGo has geo-referenced charts and plates, is compatible with almost any ADSB solution, and is loaded with a bunch of little perks. That said, syncing your EFB with a GNS430 at this point should not be a huge factor in my opinion. It should work with FlightStream but I haven't tried it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |